I have always admired the culturismo, I like to observe it and in fact always I have been assiduous to competitions and biographies of great world-wide athletes; but in my personal case not it practitioner at competitive level, in spite of preparing many athletes. Frequently they ask to me, because you do not practice it or because you do not compete? Simply it is not the style of life in agreement with me. the musculacin enchants to me, to be always in it forms, to prepare athletes; but not to give me completely to the hard life culturist. But, that is what we must look for all? From my point of view, you have before nothing that to look for the optimum point for you. And I talk about the point in which you can be seen well and be taken the life that you like.
In my personal case, I am in the search of you mature muscular, in finding the point where it sees me at the moment of the same form in which I hope to see next the ten or fifteen years me, without needing losing mass. I do not know if you have had the opportunity to observe American athletes who have been great extraordinary champions in their size, and now they are unrecognizable. I agree with looking for the point where you can be well during long time and every time you see yourself more mature. Then, the present tendencies of the culturismo are now accepting the symmetrical physicists and the idea that the volume is not it everything, even though who even the noticeable tendency to extraordinary with excessive average parts this present. And the truth all that this good, because for that the pleasures became! In the personnel, fodder that you must look for the maximum muscular volume, as long as that does not affect your symmetry, because if of which it is not worth everything? If you have a weak zone you must apply the principle of muscular priority and give a special treatment to that part, until you can make level it with the rest, because in you complete of that treats, certain?